WANGBo-wen,MAHua-ji,PANHui,et al.Optimization of Operation Mode of Modified Step Feed-Multistage A/O System for Sewage Treatment[J].China Water & Wastewater,2025,41(5):8-17.
改良型多点进水多级A/O系统运行模式的优化
- Title:
- Optimization of Operation Mode of Modified Step Feed-Multistage A/O System for Sewage Treatment
- 关键词:
- 多点进水多级A/O工艺; 脱氮除磷; 沉降性能; 生物活性; 物料平衡
- Keywords:
- step feed-multistage A/O process; nitrogen and phosphorus removal; settleability; bioactivity; mass balance
- 摘要:
- 通过建立改良型多点进水多级A/O小试系统,以模拟生活污水为处理对象,先后采取3段模式和2段模式进行连续运行,研究了不同模式下系统的工艺性能、活性污泥沉降性能和生物活性,以及优化模式下系统的物料平衡。结果表明,在2段模式下系统出水水质满足国家一级A排放标准;系统对总氮和总磷的去除率分别为82.80%和92.98%,均高于3段模式。系统内活性污泥的沉降性能良好,SV和SVI的平均值分别为36.80%和80.74 mL/g,不会发生污泥膨胀;而在3段模式下运行则容易发生丝状污泥膨胀,导致运行失败。2段模式下的污泥活性高于3段模式,比释磷速率、比反硝化速率、比硝化速率和比摄磷速率分别为0.77、3.99、1.12和0.21 mg/(g·h),分别是3段模式下对应污泥活性的1.33、4.56、1.30和1.90倍。2段运行模式更适合改良型多点进水多级A/O系统。2段模式下,系统的COD、N和P物料平衡率分别为93.81%、97.79%和83.77%;系统脱氮所消耗的碳源为5.25 g/g,第一段和第二段脱氮所消耗的碳源分别为4.12和6.65 g/g;厌氧释磷所消耗的碳源为11.29 g/g。
- Abstract:
- The bench-scale modified step feed-multistage A/O system was set up to treat synthetic sewage. It was operated successively with three-stage mode and two-stage mode. The process performance, settleability and bioactivity of activated sludge, and mass balance of process system under optimized operation mode were investigated. The results showed that the effluent water quality under two-stage mode could stably met the requirements of class I-A in GB 18918-2002. The removal efficiencies of TN and TP under two-stage mode were 82.80% and 92.98%, respectively. They were both higher than those under three-stage mode. The settleability of activated sludge was desirable. The average sludge settling volume (SV) and sludge volume index (SVI) were 36.80% and 80.74 mL/g, respectively. There was no filamentous bulking. While the filamentous bulking arose easily under three-stage mode, which could result in the operation failure. The bioactivity of activated sludge under two?stage mode was higher than that under three-stage mode. The specific phosphorus release rate, specific denitrification rate, specific nitrification rate, and specific phosphorus uptake rate were 0.77 mg/(g·h), 3.99 mg/(g·h), 1.12 mg/(g·h), and 0.21 mg/(g·h), respectively. They were 1.33 times, 4.56 times, 1.30 times, and 1.90 times of those under three-stage mode. Compared with three-stage mode, the two-stage mode was desirable for the modified step feed-multistage A/O system. The balances of COD, nitrogen and phosphorus were 93.81%, 97.79% and 83.77%, respectively. The carbon sources consumed for nitrogen removal was 5.25 g/g, and it was 4.12 g/g for the first stage and 6.65 g/g for the second stage. The carbon sources consumed for phosphorus removal was 11.29 g/g.
相似文献/References:
[1]黄良波,黄世浏,曹贵华,等.ABR-AO生化沉淀一体化污水处理工艺设计[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(2):54.
HUANG Liang-bo,HUANG Shi-liu,CAO Gui-hua,et al.Design of ABR-AO Biochemical Sedimentation Integrative Wastewater Treatment Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):54.
[2]郑晓英,徐智,张远,等.纳米氧化铈对好氧污泥颗粒化进程的影响[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(3):21.
ZHENGXiao-ying,XUZhi,ZHANGYuan,et al.Effect of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles on Aerobic Granulation Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):21.
[3]王宏伟,张国珍,武福平,等.两级A/O生物滤池与微絮凝过滤组合处理二级出水[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(5):65.
WANGHong-wei,ZHANGGuo-zhen,WU Fu-ping,et al.Two?stage A/O Biofilter Combined with Micro-flocculation Filtration for Secondary Effluent Treatment[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):65.
[4]崔涛,李胜,田敏,等.氧化沟型A2/O工艺脱氮除磷性能评价[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(7):75.
CUITao,LISheng,TIANMin,et al.Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal Performance in an Oxidation Ditch Based A2/O Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):75.
[5]曾晓岚,尹嘉豪,陈亮,等.电化学工艺处理滇池流域农业面源污水[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(13):105.
ZENGXiao-lan,YINJia-hao,CHENLiang,et al.Electrochemical Process for Treatment of Agricultural Non-point Source Sewage in Dianchi Basin[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):105.
[6]何春求,周少奇.改良A2/O—MBR工艺仿真模拟及运行优化[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(15):90.
HEChun-qiu,ZHOUShao-qi.Simulation of Modified A2/O-MBR Process and Its Operation Optimization[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):90.
[7]刘流,倪黄蕾,梁军,等.二沉池不同径向分布活性污泥对脱氮除磷的影响[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(15):104.
LIULiu,NIHuang-lei,LIANGJun,et al.Effect of Different Radial Distribution of Activated Sludge on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal in Secondary Settling Tank[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):104.
[8]李易寰,董玉明,高芳.AAOA-MBR工艺在污水厂提标扩建中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(18):114.
LIYi-huan,DONGYu-ming,GAOFang.Application of AAOA-MBR Process in Sewage Treatment Plant Upgrading and Expansion[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):114.
[9]吴志明,陈学春,赵欣,等.Nereda好氧颗粒污泥工艺的脱氮除磷性能及工程实例[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(22):16.
WUZhi-ming,CHENXue-chun,ZHAOXin,et al.Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal via the Nereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):16.
[10]朱爽,杨万全,汪和方,等.温州市南片污水处理厂提标改造工艺调试及运行[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(22):84.
ZHUShuang,YANGWan-quan,WANGHe-fang,et al.Commissioning and Operation of Upgrading and Reconstruction Project in Wenzhou South WWTP[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(5):84.