高出水标准下的再生水厂COD深度处理工艺比选
- Title:
- Comparison and Selection of Advanced Treatment Process for COD Removal from Reclaimed Water Plants with High Effluent Quality
- Keywords:
- font-size: 10pt; ">reclaimed water plants; high effluent quality; ozone catalytic oxidation; pulsed carbon adsorption tank; down- font-size: 10pt; ">flow carbon adsorption tank; activated coke adsorption bed
- 摘要:
-
北京市某再生水厂设计规模为8×104 m3/d，出水水质执行北京市地方标准《城镇污水处理厂水污染物排放标准》（DB 11/890—2012）A标准。该厂采用多段进水A2O+MBR工艺作为主处理工艺，由于其出水COD很难稳定达到京标A标准的要求（COD≤20 mg/L），需增加COD深度处理单元。对目前可选择的深度处理工艺——臭氧催化氧化、脉冲炭吸附、下向流炭吸附及活性焦吸附工艺就占地面积、投资、运行成本及工艺的实际应用情况进行了比较。结果表明,臭氧催化氧化工艺占地面积最小，脉冲炭吸附和下向流炭吸附工艺初期投资较低，活性焦吸附及下向流炭吸附工艺运行成本更低。臭氧催化氧化、脉冲炭吸附、活性焦吸附工艺均有实际应用案例。综合考虑，最终确定脉冲炭吸附和活性焦吸附工艺是现阶段较好的COD深度处理把关工艺。
- Abstract:
-
The effluent of a reclaimed water plant in Beijing, with a design scale of 8 ×104 m3/d, implemented class A standard of Beijing local standard Discharge Standard of Water Pollutants for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants (DB 11/890-2012) (Beijing standard A). It was proposed to adopt multi-stage water inlet A2O+MBR process. Because it was difficult for the effluent COD to stably meet the requirements of the Beijing standard A(COD≤20 mg/L), advanced COD removal processing unit ought to be added. The theoretically feasible methods, such as the ozone catalytic oxidation, the pulsed carbon adsorption tank, the downflow carbon adsorption tank and the activated coke adsorption bed process, were compared in terms of land occupation, investment, operating cost and practical application of the process. The results showed that ozone catalytic oxidation covers the smallest area. The initial investment of the pulsed carbon adsorption tank and the downflow carbon adsorption tank was lower, and the operating cost of the activated coke adsorption bed and the down-flow carbon adsorption tank was lower. The ozone catalytic oxidation, the pulsed carbon adsorption tank, the active coke adsorption bed had practical application cases of the wastewater plant. Considering the above factors, it was concluded that the processes of pulsed carbon adsorption and activated coke adsorption were the better processes for COD removing advanced treatment at present.
相似文献/References:
[1]孙永利,张维,郑兴灿,等.城镇居民人均日生活污水污染物产生量测算之产污规律[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(6):1.
[2]范荣桂,刘娜,尹利鹏,等.污泥厌氧催化快速发酵产VFAs的试验研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(11):69.
[3]镇祥华,余琴芳,万年红,等.污水处理厂二级出水深床滤池超深度脱氮研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(11):91.
[4]赵美玲,朱涛,冯江,等.水力模型在合流制调蓄池进水管改造中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(7):114.
[5]朱一文,王文亮.基于水文方法的暴雨调节塘规模计算[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(7):118.
[6]李骏飞,李欢,杨磊三.粤港澳大湾区创新治水模式分享[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):1.
[7]李激,王燕,熊红松,等.城镇污水处理厂消毒设施运行调研与优化策略[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):7.
[8]赵锡锋,李兴强,李军.好氧颗粒污泥技术中试研究及应用进展[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):30.
[9]王建西.PTA2O工艺用于养猪废水处理及其Anammox现象分析[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):56.
[10]高海英,邓磊,侯晓庆,等.MBR工艺在西安经开草滩污水处理厂中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):63.
[11]莫俊锋,王文亮,白献宇,等.基于设计暴雨法的CSO调蓄池池容计算方法探讨[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):77.
[12]郭健.纳入大直径热力管的综合管廊设计研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):82.
[13]蒙政成,冼萍,黄付平,等.NCMBR工艺在工业园区污水处理工程中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):88.