基于HYSWMM的LID与传统模式下雨水管网对比

中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU] 卷: 第36卷期数: 2020年第11期页码: 117-122 栏目: 出版日期: 2020-06-05

Title:: Comparison of Stormwater Pipe Network between LID Mode and Traditional Mode Based on HYSWMM

作者:: 曹喆，王川涛，王成坤

关键词:: font-size: 10pt; ">低影响开发; 雨水管网; 鸿业暴雨排水及低影响开发系统; 重现期

Keywords:: font-size: 10pt; ">low impact development; stormwater pipe network; HYSWMM; return period

摘要:: 以深圳市光明新区光明北片区为研究区域，采用鸿业暴雨排水及低影响开发系统（HYSWMM）模型模拟不同降雨条件下低影响开发（LID）模式的雨水管网运行情况，从径流系数、管网排水能力、管道充满度、节点水深、径流峰值、峰现时间等方面分析LID对雨水管网运行状态的影响。结果表明，对于重现期≤10年的2 h短历时降雨，LID设施的加入对雨水径流具有削减作用，与传统开发模式相比，LID模式下区域径流系数由0.53~0.67降低至0.42~0.56，排水能力提升约10%，管网排放口总出流量峰值降低9.9%~15.9%，节点最大水深降低0.09~0.5 m，充满度最大降低0.22，峰现时间最大可延迟3 min；对于重现期为50年的24 h长历时降雨，LID模式下管网排放口总出流量峰值相比传统开发模式几乎无变化，LID模式在极端暴雨情况下对雨水管网运行状态的影响微弱。

Abstract:: Operation of stormwater pipe network in low impact development (LID) mode in northern area of Guangming District, Shenzhen at different rainfall conditions was simulated by using HYSWMM, and the influence of LID on the operation of stormwater pipe network was analyzed from the aspects of runoff coefficient, drainage capacity of pipe network, depth ratio, node water depth, runoff peak and peak time. For 2 hours shortduration rainfall with a return period less than 10 years, the addition of LID facilities could reduce stormwater runoff.Compared with traditional mode, regional runoff coefficient decreased from 0.53-0.67 to 0.42-0.56, drainage capacity increased by about 10%, the peak discharge of pipe network outlet decreased by 9.9%-15.9%, the maximum water depth of the node decreased by 0.09-0.5 m, the depth ratio decreased by 0.22 at most, and the peak time was prolonged by 3 minutes. For the 24 hours long-duration rainfall with a return period of 50 years, the peak discharge of pipe network outlet in LID mode was almost unchanged compared with that in the traditional mode, and the influence of LID mode on the operation of stormwater pipe network in extreme storm was weak.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙永利,张维,郑兴灿,等.城镇居民人均日生活污水污染物产生量测算之产污规律[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(6):1.
[2]范荣桂,刘娜,尹利鹏,等.污泥厌氧催化快速发酵产VFAs的试验研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(11):69.
[3]镇祥华,余琴芳,万年红,等.污水处理厂二级出水深床滤池超深度脱氮研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(11):91.
[4]赵美玲,朱涛,冯江,等.水力模型在合流制调蓄池进水管改造中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(7):114.
[5]朱一文,王文亮.基于水文方法的暴雨调节塘规模计算[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(7):118.
[6]李骏飞,李欢,杨磊三.粤港澳大湾区创新治水模式分享[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):1.
[7]李激,王燕,熊红松,等.城镇污水处理厂消毒设施运行调研与优化策略[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):7.
[8]赵锡锋,李兴强,李军.好氧颗粒污泥技术中试研究及应用进展[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):30.
[9]王建西.PTA2O工艺用于养猪废水处理及其Anammox现象分析[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):56.
[10]高海英,邓磊,侯晓庆,等.MBR工艺在西安经开草滩污水处理厂中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):63.
[11]莫俊锋,王文亮,白献宇,等.基于设计暴雨法的CSO调蓄池池容计算方法探讨[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):77.
[12]郭健.纳入大直径热力管的综合管廊设计研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):82.
[13]蒙政成,冼萍,黄付平,等.NCMBR工艺在工业园区污水处理工程中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(8):88.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-01