YUAN Ya-shu,CHEN Zheng-yang,FU Jin-xiang,et al.Practice and Consideration of Commissioning and Operation of Iron and Manganese Removal Filter Treating Groundwater in Liaozhong District of Shenyang City[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(15):35-40.
地下水源除铁锰滤池调试运行实践及思考
- Title:
- Practice and Consideration of Commissioning and Operation of Iron and Manganese Removal Filter Treating Groundwater in Liaozhong District of Shenyang City
- Keywords:
- groundwater; manganese removal; iron removal; backwash; commissioning
- 摘要:
- 为了解决沈阳市辽中区西水厂出水锰含量长期超标问题，对该水厂除铁除锰滤池进行调试。采用扫洗、翻砂和添加10~15 cm成熟滤料等措施对滤池进行调试，68 d后出水Mn2+浓度低于0.1 mg/L，滤池恢复期为68 d；只采用扫洗、翻砂措施时，滤池恢复期为80 d；未进行调试滤池的出水锰浓度会逐渐升高，可达到0.48~0.61 mg/L，出水铁、锰不达标。用高压水枪对滤层表面进行扫洗和翻砂能够有效解决滤池堵塞问题，调试成熟且稳定以后的滤池过滤周期可达25~30 h。水厂成功运行时滤池的平均滤速为7~14 m/h、反冲洗强度为11~12 L/(s·m2)、反冲洗时间为20~25 min、过滤周期为24 h，滤池出水水质能够达到《生活饮用水卫生标准》(GB 5749—2006)的要求。
- Abstract:
- An iron and manganese removal filter of the West Waterworks in Liaozhong District of Shenyang City was debugged to solve the problem of excessive manganese content in effluent for a long time. The filter was debugged by cleaning, sanding and adding 10-15 cm mature filter materials. After 68 days, Mn2+ in the effluent was lower than 0.1 mg/L, and recovery period of the filter was 68 days. The recovery period of the filter was 80 days when only cleaning and sanding were adopted. The effluent manganese concentration of the filter without commissioning gradually increased and it eventually reached 0.48-0.61 mg/L, and the effluent iron and manganese concentration couldn’t meet the standard. Using a high-pressure water gun to clean and scrape the surface of the filter layer could effectively solve the problem of filter blockage. The filtration period reached 25-30 hours after successfully commission of the filter. During the operation of the waterworks, average filtration velocity of the filter was 7-14 m/h, backwash intensity was 11-12 L/(s·m2), backwash time was 20-25 min, and filtration period was 24 hours. The effluent quality could meet Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB 5749-2006).
相似文献/References:
[1]张安嫒.滤料粒径对地下水中铁、锰、氨氮、浊度去除效果的影响[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(7):47.
[2]王慧文,陈卫,陶辉.预氧化/超滤组合除锰工艺的膜污染特性[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(9):22.
[3]李圭白,杨海洋,仲琳,等.锰质滤膜活性对接触氧化除锰及除氨氮效能的影响[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(21):1.
LI Gui-bai,YANG Hai-yang,ZHONG Lin,et al.Effect of Manganese Oxides Film Activity on Removal Efficiencies of Manganese and Ammonia Nitrogen by Contact Oxidation[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(15):1.
[4]由昆,范维利,傅金祥,等.载锰活性氧化铝除氟降铁效能研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(23):42.
YOU Kun,FAN Wei-li,FU Jin-xiang,et al.Fluorine and Iron Removal Efficiency of Manganese-loaded Activated Alumina[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(15):42.
[5]赵蓓,李林彬,赵云鹏,等.水源水质对地下水管网铁释放的影响和控制技术研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(23):52.
ZHAO Bei,LI Lin-bin,ZHAO Yun-peng,et al.Influence of Source Water Quality on Iron Release in Groundwater Distribution Networks and Its Control Technology[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(15):52.
[6]赵蓓,张海祥,李礼,等.自备井置换区域管网水质风险评估[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(13):32.
ZHAO Bei,ZHANG Hai-xiang,LI Li,et al.Risk Assessment for Water Quality of Distribution Network in Areas Using Self-supply Wells after Water Source Replacement[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(15):32.
[7]刘昭,徐向前,王思斌,等.含氯预氧化剂与碳材料联用去除饮用水中高浓度锰[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(21):19.
LIU Zhao,XU Xiang-qian,WANG Si-bin,et al.Combination of Chlorine-containing Pre-oxidants and Carbon Materials to Remove High Concentration of Manganese from Drinking Water Source:Synergistic Effect and Mechanism[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(15):19.
[8]汪锐,胡惠秩,邵森林.通量对膜法除锰工艺净水特性及阻力变化的影响[J].中国给水排水,2023,39(9):26.
WANGRui,HUHui-zhi,SHAOSen-lin.Effect of Flux on Manganese Removal and Hydraulic Resistance in a Membrane?based Manganese Removal Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2023,39(15):26.
[9]王旭峰,杨涛,徐秀丽,等.三维电极生物膜与硫自养耦合工艺脱氮特性[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(17):31.
WANGXu-feng,YANGTao,XUXiu-li,et al.Nitrogen Removal in Three?dimensional Electrode Biofilm Coupled with Sulfur Autotrophic Process：Influence of HRT and Sodium Bicarbonate[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(15):31.