GUAN Lin,TAO Meng-ni,JING Zhao-qian.Enhanced Nitrogen Removal and Electricity Generation Efficiency of Constructed Wetland-Microbial Fuel Cells for Purification of Tail Water from Wastewater Treatment Plant[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):7-13.
人工湿地—微生物燃料电池强化尾水脱氮产电效能
- Title:
- Enhanced Nitrogen Removal and Electricity Generation Efficiency of Constructed Wetland-Microbial Fuel Cells for Purification of Tail Water from Wastewater Treatment Plant
- Keywords:
- constructed wetland; microbial fuel cell; tail water; nitrogen removal; electricity generation
- 摘要:
- 采用人工湿地—微生物燃料电池工艺（CW—MFCs）处理城市污水厂尾水，强化脱氮并产生电能。分别以氨氮（Ⅰ号反应器）和硝态氮(Ⅱ号反应器)作为单一氮源，考察了两组反应器的COD、氨氮、硝态氮去除率及输出电压。结果表明，Ⅰ号反应器的COD去除率高于Ⅱ号反应器，最高达到78.81%；两组装置对氨氮/硝态氮的去除率均平稳上升；Ⅰ号反应器的产出电压和最大功率密度分别达到了126 mV和6.01 mW/m3，高于Ⅱ号反应器（58 mV、1.12 mW/m3）。通过检测DO、COD和氮浓度的分布发现，Ⅰ号反应器中的DO分布梯度大于Ⅱ号反应器，COD的去除主要发生在阳极区，硝化反应主要发生在阴极区，反硝化反应主要发生在阳极区。
- Abstract:
- The tail water from wastewater treatment plant was treated by constructed wetland-microbial fuel cells (CW-MFCs) to enhance nitrogen removal and electricity generation. Ammonia nitrogen (reactor Ⅰ) or nitrate nitrogen (reactor Ⅱ) was applied as a single nitrogen resource, and COD and ammonia nitrogen/nitrate nitrogen removal efficiency and output voltage of the two reactors were investigated. The COD removal efficiency of reactor Ⅰwas higher than that of reactor Ⅱ, which was up to 78.81%. The ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen removal efficiencies increased steadily in the two reactors. In addition, the output voltage and maximum power density of reactor Ⅰ were 126 mV and 6.01 mW/m3, respectively, which were higher than those of reactor Ⅱ (58 mV and 1.12 mW/m3). The distribution of DO, COD and nitrogen concentrations showed that DO gradient in reactor Ⅰwas higher than that in reactor Ⅱ, COD was mainly removed in anode region, and nitrification and denitrification mainly occurred in cathode region and anode region, respectively.
相似文献/References:
[1]杜曼曼,张琼华,连斌,等.城市污水处理厂尾水人工湿地净化工程调试与运行[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(9):94.
[2]王晓云,蒋柱武,付爱民.UASB+两级人工湿地组合工艺处理农村污水[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(11):21.
[3]杜建强,杜滢明,张瑛,等.昆山珠泾中心河黑臭河道的系统施治设计与应用效果[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(12):129.
DU Jian-qiang,DU Ying-ming,ZHANG Ying,et al.Design and Application Effect of Systematic Treatment of Black and Odorous River in Zhujing Central River, Kunshan[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(13):129.
[4]张立成,于天宇,张爽,等.多阴极室反硝化除磷产电装置启动运行研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(15):52.
ZHANG Li-cheng,YU Tian-yu,ZHANG Shuang,et al.Startup and Operation of Denitrifying Phosphorus Removal and Electrogenesis Device with Multicathode Chamber Treating Domestic Sewage[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(13):52.
[5]Jan Vymazal,卫婷,赵亚乾,等.细数植物在人工湿地污水处理中的作用[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(2):25.
Jan Vymazal,WEI Ting,ZHAO Ya-qian,et al.Counting the Roles of Plants in Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):25.
[6]邓敬轩,周润杰,单晓红,等.携菌新型生物质基材用于微污染水体治理[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(11):1.
DENG Jing-xuan,ZHOU Run-jie,SHAN Xiao-hong,et al.Biomass Substrate Carrying Bacteria for Treatment of Micro-polluted River Water[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):1.
[7]许青兰,孔令为,沈浙萍,等.浙江省档案局微污染景观水体生态修复工程实例[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(16):108.
XU Qing-lan,KONG Ling-wei,SHEN Zhe-ping,et al.Demonstration of Ecological Restoration Project for Micro-polluted Landscape Waters in Zhejiang Provincial Archives Bureau[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):108.
[8]王晓云,付爱民,李启明.曝气氧化塘+人工湿地组合工艺处理农村污水[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(21):64.
WANG Xiao-yun,FU Ai-min,LEE King-ming.Combined Process of Aeration Pond and Constructed Wetland for Treatment of Rural Sewage[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):64.
[9]肖海文,刘馨瞳,翟俊,等.人工湿地类型的选择及案例分析[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(22):11.
XIAO Hai-wen,LIU Xin-tong,ZHAI Jun,et al.Type Selection of Constructed Wetlands and Related Design Case Analysis[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):11.
[10]姜春杰.改良Bardenpho+粉末活性炭+人工湿地处理生活污水[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(2):93.
JIANG Chun?jie.Application of Improved Bardenpho, PAC and Constructed Wetland Process in Sewage Treatment[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(13):93.