[1]徐嘉琪,黄廷林,文刚,等.循环造粒流化床去除不同特性有机物的效果及强化[J].中国给水排水,2025,41(3):58-64.
　XUJia-qi,HUANGTing-lin,WENGang,et al.Removal Efficiency and Enhancement of Various Organic Matters in a Circulating Granulation Fluidized Bed System[J].China Water & Wastewater,2025,41(3):58-64.
点击复制

循环造粒流化床去除不同特性有机物的效果及强化

中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU] 卷: 第41卷 期数: 2025年第3期 页码: 58-64 栏目: 出版日期: 2025-02-01
Title:
Removal Efficiency and Enhancement of Various Organic Matters in a Circulating Granulation Fluidized Bed System
作者:
徐嘉琪1,2， 黄廷林1,2， 文刚1,2， 邢翔轩1,2， 许钰琪1,2
（1.西安建筑科技大学 西北水资源与环境生态教育部重点实验室，陕西 西安 710055；2.西安建筑科技大学 陕西省环境工程重点实验室，陕西 西安 710055）
Author(s):
XU　Jia-qi1，2， HUANG　Ting-lin1，2， WEN　Gang1，2， XING　Xiang-xuan1，2， XU　Yu-qi1，2
（1. Northwest China Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment Ecology， Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology， Xi’an 710055， China； 2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering， Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology， Xi’an 710055， China）
关键词:
循环造粒流化床;  有机物;  腐殖酸;  富里酸;  预氯化
Keywords:
circulating granulation-fluidized bed;  organic matter;  humic acid;  fulvic acid;  pre?chlorination
摘要:
循环造粒流化床作为一种新型高效固液分离技术，前期研究表明，其对不同水质水体的浊度均具有良好的去除效果，为此，进一步考察了其对不同特性有机物的去除效果，并将其与预氯化结合以探究对有机物的强化去除效果。结果表明，流化床系统对腐殖酸的去除效果明显好于富里酸，对腐殖酸的UV254、CODMn、DOC去除率分别达到89.11%、74.55%、60.29%，而对富里酸的相应指标去除率分别为44.60%、5.74%、17.16%。与传统混凝沉淀工艺相比，循环造粒流化床对UV254、CODMn和DOC的去除率分别可提高1%~13%、4%~18%、1%~25%，这是因为循环造粒流化床去除有机物的途径不仅包括混凝作用，还包括结团絮体的表面吸附和截留作用。采用预氯化进行强化后，循环造粒流化床对UV254、CODMn和DOC的去除率分别可提升4.65%~29.10%、4.15%~58.59%和4%~10%，这是因为次氯酸钠破坏了包裹在颗粒外面的有机物，利于颗粒沉降，提升悬浮层性能。
Abstract:
As an innovative high-efficiency solid?liquid separation technology, the circulating granulation fluidized bed has demonstrated significant efficacy in removing turbidity across various water qualities. Consequently, this study further examined its removal performance on different types of organic matter and investigated the enhanced removal efficiency when combined with pre-chlorination. The removal efficiency of humic acid in the fluidized bed system was significantly superior to that of fulvic acid. The removal efficiencies of humic acid in terms of UV254, CODMn and DOC were 89.11%, 74.55% and 60.29%, respectively, whereas those for fulvic acid were 44.60%, 5.74% and 17.16%, respectively. Compared to the conventional coagulation and sedimentation process, the removal efficiencies of UV254, CODMn, and DOC could be enhanced by 1% to 13%, 4% to 18%, and 1% to 25%, respectively. This improvement was attributed to the fact that the removal pathway of organic matters in the circulating granulation fluidized bed included not only coagulation but also surface adsorption and interception of the flocs. After implementing pre-chlorination, the removal efficiencies of UV254, CODMn, and DOC could be enhanced by 4.65% to 29.10%, 4.15% to 58.59%, and 4% to 10%, respectively. This improvement was attributed to sodium hypochlorite’s ability to disrupt the organic matters surrounding particles, thereby facilitating particle settling and enhancing the performance of the suspension layer.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙书博,谢益佳,黄廷林,等.循环造粒流化床处理水厂排泥水的试验研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(7):12.
[2]陶辉,厉彦辉,周伟青,等.针对低温期有机物去除率低的生物活性炭更换探究[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(9):33.
　TAOHui,LIYan-hui,ZHOUWei-qing,et al.Research on the Replacement of Biological Activated Carbon for Low Organic Matter Removal Rate during Low Temperature Period[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(3):33.
[3]王永强,李桂芳,宋武昌,等.UV/H2O2工艺对常规砂滤出水中有机物的去除特性[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(17):60.
　WANGYong-qiang,LIGui-fang,SONGWu-chang,et al.Removal Characteristics of Organic Matter in Effluent from Conventional Sand Filtration by UV/H2O2 Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(3):60.
[4]郝晓地,孙群,李季,等.排水管道甲烷产生影响因素及其估算方法[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(20):1.
　HAOXiao-di,SUNQun,LIJi,et al.Affecting Factors and Estimating Methods of Methane Produced in Sewers[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(3):1.
[5]颉亚玮,徐振峰,裘嘉琪,等.纳滤膜去除水中有机物及提高产水率的生产性试验[J].中国给水排水,2023,39(7):29.
　XIEYa-wei,XUZhen-feng,QIUJia-qi,et al.Productive Test on Nanofiltration Membrane to Remove Organic Matter from Water and Improve Water Production Rate[J].China Water & Wastewater,2023,39(3):29.
[6]刘志娟.炭吸附机械搅拌澄清池用于深度处理去除有机物[J].中国给水排水,2023,39(14):109.
　LIU Zhi-juan.Application of Carbon Adsorption Accelerator in Wastewater Advanced Treatment for Organics Removal[J].China Water & Wastewater,2023,39(3):109.
[7]关鹤达,杨博暄,温沁雪,等.高铁酸钾强化磁絮凝去除污水厂二级出水有机物[J].中国给水排水,2023,39(21):73.
　GUANHe-da,YANGBo-xuan,WENQin-xue,et al.Potassium Ferrate Enhanced Magnetic Flocculation for the Removal of Organic Matters in Effluent from Secondary Treatment Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2023,39(3):73.
[8]朱明飞,郑成龙,崔雯,等.分子质量对天然水体有机物正渗透膜分离的影响[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(9):107.
　ZHUMing-fei,ZHENGCheng-long,CUIWen,et al.Effect of Molecular Weight on Forward Osmosis Membrane for Separation of Organic Matters in Natural Water[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(3):107.
[9]王群,梁柚恒,胡涛,等.零价铁活化高铁酸盐降解水中双酚AF[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(13):79.
　WANGQun,LIANGYou-heng,HUTao,et al.Zero?valent Iron Activated Ferrate for Degradation of Bisphenol AF in Water[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(3):79.
[10]孙鹏,虎春生,焦茹媛,等.带衬及非带衬MBR膜污染物识别及膜污染差异解析[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(17):9.
　SUNPeng,HUChun-sheng,JIAORu-yuan,et al.Identification and Analysis of Membrane Fouling with and without Lining in MBR[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(3):9.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-01