[1]陈浩林,王忍,安东,等.多模式A/O+MBR工艺的碳排放及优化途径分析[J].中国给水排水,2026,42(12):58-63.
　CHENHaolin,WANGRen,ANDong,et al.Analysis of Carbon Emissions and Optimization Approaches of Multi-mode A/O+MBR Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2026,42(12):58-63.
点击复制

多模式A/O+MBR工艺的碳排放及优化途径分析

中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU] 卷: 第42卷 期数: 2026年第12期 页码: 58-63 栏目: 出版日期: 2026-06-17
Title:
Analysis of Carbon Emissions and Optimization Approaches of Multi-mode A/O+MBR Process
作者:
陈浩林1,2， 王忍3， 安东1,2， 方运川2， 张鑫4， 王伟4， 史乃彪1， 柳振伟2， 赵媛5， 彭轶1,2
（1.北京信通碧水再生水有限公司，北京 101149；2.信开环境投资集团有限公司，北京 101101；3.四川远通规划设计有限公司 成都分公司，四川 成都 610000；4.黑龙江工程学院 土木与建筑工程学院，黑龙江 哈尔滨 150050；5.北京市通州区水务局，北京 101199）
Author(s):
CHEN　Haolin1，2， WANG　Ren3， AN　Dong1，2， FANG　Yunchuan2， ZHANG　Xin4， WANG Wei4， SHI Naibiao1， LIU Zhenwei2， ZHAO Yuan5， PENG　Yi1，2
（1. Beijing Xintong Bishui Reclaimed Water Co. Ltd.， Beijing 101149， China； 2. Xinkai Environment Investment Group Co. Ltd.， Beijing 101101， China； 3. Chengdu Branch， Sichuan Yuantong Planning and Design Co. Ltd.， Chengdu 610000， China； 4. College of Civil and Architectural Engineering， Heilongjiang Institute of Technology， Harbin 150050， China； 5. Tongzhou District Water Affairs Bureau of Beijing Municipality， Beijing 101199， China）
关键词:
地下污水处理厂;  MBR工艺;  运行效能;  碳排放
Keywords:
underground sewage treatment plant;  MBR process;  operational efficiency;  carbon emissions
摘要:
在“双碳”目标背景下，如何在现行污水处理工艺运行条件下实现碳减排对污水处理低碳运行提出了新要求与新使命。以我国北方某3万m3/d处理规模的MBR工艺地下式污水处理厂为例进行碳排放分析，综合污水处理效率、能耗成本核算出该污水处理厂的碳排放强度为1.45 kgCO2/m3，直接碳排放量约占全厂碳排放总量的20%，间接碳排放量占全厂碳排放总量的80%；在间接碳排方面，电耗的碳排放量占比最高，占总碳排放量的53.93%；药耗的碳排放量占总碳排放量的26.17%。减碳降碳措施方面，在水质达标排放的前提下，以持续优化工艺和设备运行策略为着力点，采用搅拌器间歇运行、除臭分浓度梯度收集等方式，该污水处理厂减碳量约6 293 kgCO2/d。
Abstract:
Under the “dual-carbon” background, how to achieve carbon reduction under the current operation conditions of sewage treatment processes has put forward new requirements and new missions for the low-carbon operation of sewage treatment. This paper conducts a carbon emission analysis on an underground MBR process sewage treatment plant with a treatment capacity of 30 000 m3/d in North China. Based on the comprehensive sewage treatment efficiency and energy consumption cost, it is calculated that the daily carbon emission intensity of this sewage treatment plant is 1.45 kgCO2/m3. Direct carbon emissions account for approximately 20% of the total carbon emissions of the entire plant, and indirect carbon emissions account for 80% of the total carbon emissions of the entire plant. In terms of indrect carbon emissions, the carbon emissions from electricity consumption account for the highest proportion, accounting for 53.93% of the total carbon emissions. The carbon emissions from chemical agents consumption account for 26.17% of the total carbon emissions. In terms of carbon reduction measures, under the premise of meeting the water quality discharge standards, the focus is on continuously optimizing the process and equipment operation strategies. Methods such as intermittent operation of agitators and gradient collection of deodorization concentrations are adopted to achieve a carbon reduction of approximately 6 293 kgCO2/d for this underground sewage treatment plant.

相似文献/References:

[1]何京钟,孙竟,刘羿,等.多级A/O-MBR工艺在垃圾渗滤液应急处理中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(6):79.
　HEJing-zhong,SUNJing,LIUYi,et al.Application of Multi-stage A/O-MBR Process in Emergency Treatment of Landfill Leachate[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(12):79.
[2]李捷,袁玮良,徐骄阳,等.生活垃圾转运站厨余垃圾渗滤液处理工程实践[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(8):125.
　LI Jie,YUANWei-liang,XUJiao-yang,et al.Engineering Practice of Kitchen Waste Leachate Treatment in a Domestic Waste Transfer Station[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(12):125.
[3]张真伟,张诗雄,陈俊,等.全重力流进水的地下污水处理厂防淹设计[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(10):69.
　ZHANGZhen-wei,ZHANGShi-xiong,CHENJun,et al.Anti-flooding Design of Underground Sewage Treatment Plant with Gravity- flow Inflow[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(12):69.
[4]徐进.地下式污水处理厂电气设备除湿方式比较研究[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(14):38.
　XUJin.Comparative Study on Dehumidification Methods of Electrical Equipment in Underground Sewage Treatment Plant[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(12):38.
[5]李志雷,张开海.芬顿预氧化+MBR工艺处理制药等化工废水[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(10):160.
　LIZhi-lei,ZHANGKai-hai.Treatment of Pharmaceutical Wastewater by Fenton Pre-oxidation and MBR Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(12):160.
[6]牛樱,仲崇军,李胜.大型地下市政+工业混合污水处理厂兼顾人防设计案例[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(14):73.
　NIU Ying,ZHONG Chong-jun,LI Sheng.Design Case of Large Underground Municipal and Industrial Mixed Wastewater Treatment Plant with Civil Air Defense Function[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(12):73.
[7]田海成,杨曦凯,焦文海,等.AAOA+MBR工艺用于济南东客站地下污水处理厂[J].中国给水排水,2023,39(22):78.
　TIANHai-cheng,YANGXi-kai,JIAOWen-hai,et al.Application of AAOA-MBR Process in Jinan Dongkezhan Underground Wastewater Treatment Plant[J].China Water & Wastewater,2023,39(12):78.
[8]李娟,杨大卫.高出水标准含氟工业废水深度处理工程实例[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(2):126.
　LIJuan,YANGDa-wei.Advanced Treatment Practice of Fluorine-containing Industrial Wastewater under High Effluent Quality Requirement[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(12):126.
[9]李洋洋,彭文峰,雷琳慧,等.基于CFD的地下污水厂无风管式通风系统效果模拟[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(17):104.
　LIYang-yang,PENGWen-feng,LEILin-hui,et al.Simulation Effect of Ductless Ventilation System in Underground Wastewater Treatment Plants Based on CFD[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(12):104.
[10]陈浩林,史大林,安东,等.北方地区多级A/O工艺与MBR工艺运行对比分析[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(18):22.
　CHENHao-lin,SHIDa-lin,ANDong,et al.Analysis of the Operation Comparison between Multi-stage A/O Process and MBR Process in North China[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(12):22.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-06-17