[1]郑俊,王梦琳,张德伟,等.无泡充氧膜生物反应器对生活污水处理效果的研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(13):55-61.
　ZHENG Jun,WANG Meng-lin,ZHANG De-wei,et al. Effect of Non-bubble Aerated Membrane Bioreactor on Domestic Wastewater Treatment [J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(13):55-61.
点击复制

无泡充氧膜生物反应器对生活污水处理效果的研究

中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU] 卷: 第36卷 期数: 2020年第13期 页码: 55-61 栏目: 出版日期: 2020-07-01
Title:
Effect of Non-bubble Aerated Membrane Bioreactor on Domestic Wastewater Treatment
作者:
郑俊1,2,3，王梦琳1，张德伟2,3，余沛1，赵梦柯1，张明睿 1
(1.安徽工业大学能源与环境学院，安徽马鞍山243002；2.安徽华骐环保科技股份有限公司，安徽马鞍山243061；3.安徽省曝气生物滤池<BAF>工程技术研究中心，安徽马鞍山243061)
Author(s):
ZHENG Jun1,2,3，WANG Meng-lin1，ZHANG De-wei1,2,3，YU Pei1,ZHAO Meng-ke1，ZHANG Ming-rui1
(1. School of Energy and Enviroment， Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243002, China;
2. Anhui Huaqi Environmental Protection Technology Co. Ltd., Ma’anshan 243061, China;
3. Anhui Province Biological Aerated Filter <BAF> Engineering Technology Research Center, Ma’anshan 243061, China)
关键词:
无泡充氧; 膜生物反应器; 生活污水; 影响因素; 碳、氮转化途径
Keywords:
non-bubble aeration; membrane bioreactor; domestic wastewater; influence factor; transformation pathway of carbon and nitrogen
摘要:
针对低碳氮比的实际生活污水，设计了一种以疏水性微孔膜作为无泡充氧和生物膜载体的膜生物反应器，研究了水力停留时间（HRT）、充氧方式、水温对反应器处理效果的影响，并探究碳、氮元素的转化途径。结果表明，在HRT为24 h、水流速度为0.068 m/s、水温为28~36 ℃、DO为（1.6±0.2） mg/L、充氧强度为0.035 MPa条件下，系统对 COD、NH+4-N和总氮的平均去除率可分别达到85.43%、72.22%、57.95%。在碳、氮元素的转化途径上，污水在通过由无泡充氧形成的生物膜的不同氧浓度梯度分层结构后，可进行同步硝化反硝化，对氨氮的去除主要依靠硝化菌完成，去除率为72.18%,对TN的去除率约为56%，而在反硝化过程中COD主要作为碳源被大量消耗，平均去除率达到85%以上。反应器主要耗能为空压机、循环泵和进水隔膜泵的电耗，无泡充氧的氧体积传质系数约为传统鼓泡式充氧的8.7倍，节约充氧电耗的潜能可达88.5%。
Abstract:
A membrane bioreactor with hydrophobic microporous membrane as the carrier of nonbubble aeration and biofilm was designed and developed,and it was applied to treat the actual domestic wastewater with low carbon and nitrogen ratio.The influence of hydraulic residence time (HRT), aeration mode and water temperature on the treatment efficiency of the reactor was studied,and the transformation pathways of carbon and nitrogen elements were explored.The average removal efficiencies of COD,NH+4-N and total nitrogen reached 85.43%, 72.22% and 57.95% when HRT was 24 h, flow velocity was 0.068 m/s, water temperature was 28-36 ℃, DO was (1.6±0.2) mg/L and aeration intensity was 0.035 MPa. During the transformation of carbon and nitrogen,simultaneous nitrification and denitrification took place when sewage passed through biofilm with different oxygen concentration gradients formed by nonbubble aeration. The removal of NH+4-N was mainly completed by nitrifying bacteria,and the removal rate was 72.18%. Meanwhile,the removal efficiency of TN was approximately 56%. During the denitrification process, COD was mainly consumed as a carbon source and its removal efficiency was more than 85%. The main energy consumption of the reactor was air compressor power consumption, circulating pump power consumption and intake diaphragm pump power consumption. The oxygen mass transfer coefficient of nonbubble aeration was 8.7 times of that of traditional bubble aeration, and the potential energy consumption of nonbubble aeration could be saved up to 88.5%.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙剑宇,雷霆,梁鹏,等.脉冲曝气在大型膜生物反应器工程中的应用与优化[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(9):100.
　SUN Jian-yu,LEI Ting,LIANG Peng,et al.Application and Optimization of Pulse Aeration in Large-scale Membrane Bioreactor[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):100.
[2]张勇,秦玉兰,樊晓丽,等.平板陶瓷膜MBR工艺在农村污水处理中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(10):120.
　ZHANG Yong,QIN Yu-lan,FAN Xiao-li,et al.Application of Flat Ceramic MBR Process in Rural Sewage Treatment[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):120.
[3]杨应明,王旭东,刘玄宁,等.汲取液EDTA-2Na对正渗透MBR运行性能的影响[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(11):9.
　YANG Ying-ming,WANG Xu-dong,LIU Xuan-ning,et al.Effect of EDTA-2Na Draw Solute on Operating Performance of Forward Osmosis MBR[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):9.
[4]李莹,刘强,陈卫,等.胞外聚合物与膜污染的相关关系研究进展[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(12):25.
　LI Ying,LIU Qiang,CHEN Wei,et al.Advances of Correlation between Extracellular Polymers and Membrane Fouling[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):25.
[5]杨宗政,张天宇,王元培,等.基于互联网监控的焦化废水处理研究[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(19):98.
　YANG Zong-zheng,ZHANG Tian-yu,WANG Yuan-pei,et al.Treatment of Coking Wastewater Based on Internet Monitoring[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(13):98.
[6]董堃,魏学睿,徐泸峰,等.响应曲面法优化Anammox-MBR工艺及膜表征[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(1):95.
　DONG Kun,WEI Xue-rui,XU Lu-feng,et al.Optimization of Anammox-MBR Process by Response Surface Methodology and Membrane Characterization[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(13):95.
[7]林静芳,张新颖,张莉敏,等.MBR工程长期运行中的膜清洗效果和膜性能变化[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(3):67.
　LINJing-fang,ZHANGXin-ying,ZHANGLi-min,et al.Membrane Cleaning Effect and Membrane Performance Change in MBR Projects during Long-term Operation[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(13):67.
[8]毛鑫,张冰,唐和礼,等.生物法减缓MBR膜污染的研究进展[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(18):34.
　MAOXin,ZHANGBing,TANGHe-li,et al.Research Progress of Biological Methods to Mitigate MBR Membrane Fouling[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(13):34.
[9]马传净,刘海园,杨德强.浸没式MBR油脂污染离线清洗方法和经济性研究[J].中国给水排水,2023,39(16):105.
　MAChuan-jing,LIUHai-yuan,YANGDe-qiang.Study on Off-line Cleaning Method and Economy of Grease Pollution in Immersed Membrane Bioreactor[J].China Water & Wastewater,2023,39(13):105.
[10]王郑伟,刘广波,陈泽滨,等.广州市某净水厂MBR膜丝检测及清洗优化[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(3):89.
　WANGZheng-wei,LIUGuang-bo,CHENZe-bin,et al.Detection of MBR Membrane in a Sewage Purification Plant in Guangzhou and Its Cleaning Optimization[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(13):89.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-01