DU Yu,GUO Shuai,PAN Gang,et al.Comparative Analysis of Pipelines Condition Assessment Protocols at Home and Abroad[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(20):9-15.
国内外排水管道状况评估系统对比分析研究
- Title:
- Comparative Analysis of Pipelines Condition Assessment Protocols at Home and Abroad
- Keywords:
- sewer pipeline; condition assessment; comparative analysis; defect
- 摘要:
- 根据英国的《排水管道状况分类手册》(第四版,SRM-4）、美国的《管道评估与认证程序》（PACP）、加拿大的《下水道物理条件分类手册》（SPCCM）和中国的《城镇排水管道检测与评估技术规程》（CJJ 181—2012），对四国的排水管道状况评估系统的缺陷定义内容、缺陷代码编制方法和评估过程进行对比研究。结果表明，造成缺陷定义差异的主要原因有适用地区的不同、管道修复技术的差异、缺陷研究的进展及结构性和功能性缺陷的定义不同。造成评估结果差异的主要原因是缺陷分数赋予和评估参数选取的不同。
- Abstract:
- Comparative studies were conducted on four different protocols in this work, including the fourth edition of Sewer Rehabilitation Manual (SRM-4) in Britain, Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (PACP) in America, Sewer Physical Condition Classification Manual (SPCCM) in Canada and Technical Specification for Inspection and Evaluation of Urban Sewer (CJJ 181-2012) in China, which aim to find out their differences in defects definitions, the characteristics of defect code compilation and the assessment processes. Major reasons for the different assessment results from each protocol have been revealed. The results show that the main reasons for the differences on the defect definitions are different application areas, different pipeline repair technologies, new progress in pipeline defect research and different definitions of structural defects and functional defects. The main reason for the difference of assessment results is the difference of defect scores and assessment parameters.
相似文献/References:
[1]李明.高水压条件下排水管道局部树脂固化修复及预处理[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(20):45.
LI Ming.Local Resin Curing Repair and Pretreatment Technology of Drainage Pipes under High Water Pressure[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(20):45.
[2]周杨军,蒋仕兰,解铭,等.非开挖修复技术在城市排水管道维护中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(20):58.
ZHOU Yang-jun,JIANG Shi-lan,XIE Ming,et al.Application of Trenchless Repair Technology in Urban Drainage Pipeline Maintenance[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(20):58.
[3]安关峰,张蓉,张欣,等.《城镇排水管道非开挖修复工程施工及验收规程》解析[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(20):71.
AN Guan-feng,ZHANG Rong,ZHANG Xin,et al.Analysis on The Specification for Construction and Acceptance of Trenchless Rehabilitation Engineering of Urban Drainage Pipeline[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(20):71.
[4]曹井国,石东优,董泽樟,等.翻转式原位固化（CIPP）技术用于城市排水管道修复[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(6):128.
CAO Jing-guo,SHI Dong-you,DONG Ze-zhang,et al.Application of Rotary Cured-in-Place Pipe(CIPP) in Urban Drainage Pipe Rehabilitation[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(20):128.
[5]刘琳,刘勇,黄宁君.新型原位热塑成型管道非开挖修复技术应用案例[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(6):134.
LIU Lin,LIU Yong,HUANG Ning-jun.Application Case of New Trenchless Pipe Rehabilitation Technology for Formed-in-Place Pipe (FIPP)[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(20):134.
[6]桑稳姣,郝世文,陈志毅,等.基于鲁棒优化模型的排水管道疏浚污泥量测算[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(19):106.
SANG Wen-jiao,HAO Shi-wen,CHEN Zhi-yi,et al.Estimation of Dredging Sludge Volume in Drainage Pipe Based on Robust Optimization Model[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(20):106.
[7]王健,刘国华,齐鲁,等.城市排水管道沉积物与污水间物质转移转化研究进展[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(24):34.
WANG Jian,LIU Guo-hua,QI Lu,et al.Research Progress in Material Transformation between Sediment and Sewage in Urban Drainage Pipeline[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(20):34.
[8]袁艺鸣,张广毅,方宏远,等.排水管道微生物群落对管道腐蚀的影响[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(8):46.
YUANYi-ming,ZHANGGuang-yi,FANGHong-yuan,et al.Influence of Microbial Community in Drainage Pipeline on Corrosion[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(20):46.
[9]田琪,叶建州,闻雪,等.《城镇排水管道原位固化修复用 内衬软管》团标解读[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(8):108.
TIANQi,YE Jian-zhou,WENXue,et al.Interpretation of China Urban Water Association Group Standard Municipal Sewer Pipelines Rehabilitation Using Cured-in-place Pipe—Lining Tubes （T/CUWA 60052-2021）[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(20):108.
[10]郝晓地,孙群,李季,等.排水管道甲烷产生影响因素及其估算方法[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(20):1.
HAOXiao-di,SUNQun,LIJi,et al.Affecting Factors and Estimating Methods of Methane Produced in Sewers[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(20):1.