[1]王亚军,徐衍超,张四永,等.曝气协同粉末活性炭调控MBR运行[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(17):71-78.
　WANGYa-jun,XUYan-chao,ZHANGSi-yong,et al.Membrane Bioreactor Operation Regulation Based on Aeration and Powdered Activated Carbon Coupling[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(17):71-78.
点击复制

曝气协同粉末活性炭调控MBR运行

中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU] 卷: 第40卷 期数: 2024年第17期 页码: 71-78 栏目: 出版日期: 2024-09-01
Title:
Membrane Bioreactor Operation Regulation Based on Aeration and Powdered Activated Carbon Coupling
作者:
王亚军1,2， 徐衍超1， 张四永1， 颜源1
（1.兰州理工大学 土木工程学院，甘肃 兰州 730050；2.兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心，甘肃 兰州 730050）
Author(s):
WANG　Ya-jun1，2， XU　Yan-chao1， ZHANG　Si-yong1， YAN　Yuan1
（1. School of Civil Engineering， Lanzhou University of Technology， Lanzhou 730050， China； 2. Western Engineering Research Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering ， Lanzhou University of Technology， Lanzhou 730050， China）
关键词:
膜生物反应器;  气水比;  粉末活性炭;  污水处理;  膜污染
Keywords:
membrane bioreactor;  air to water ratio;  powdered activated carbon;  sewage treatment;  membrane fouling
摘要:
为了解决膜生物反应器（MBR）处理效果不稳定和运行成本高的问题，通过优化曝气和粉末活性炭（PAC）的耦合作用，调控MBR的运行。通过构建6 种工况，考察了不同气水比和不同PAC投加量条件下MBR的处理效果、污泥混合液特性和膜污染情况。结果表明，当气水比为65∶1、PAC投加量为1 g/L时，MBR的运行效能最佳，对COD、TN、NH4+-N、TP的平均去除率分别为95.81%、43.22%、85.17%和31.64%，跨膜压差（TMP）增速也较低，约为2.692 kPa/d；当气水比为65∶1、PAC投加量为2 g/L时，对COD、TN、NH4+-N、TP的平均去除率均在前者的基础上分别有2%、26%、8%和42%的提升，TMP增速增加至6.425 kPa/d，此时虽然处理效果更好但运行成本较高，膜过滤周期较短。因此在PAC-MBR的实际应用中，需要先权衡预期处理效果和运行成本再进行MBR运行参数的设置，应用该控制策略可灵活调节PAC-MBR以适应减污降碳的发展趋势。
Abstract:
To address the issues of unstable treatment performance and high operating cost associated with membrane bioreactor (MBR), the coupling effect of aeration and powdered activated carbon (PAC) was optimized to regulate the operation of MBR. The treatment performance, characteristics of sludge mixture and membrane fouling of MBR under various gas to water ratios and PAC dosages were investigated through the construction of 6 working conditions. When the gas to water ratio was 65∶1 and the dosage of PAC was 1 g/L, the operational efficiency of MBR reached its optimum, and the average removal rates of COD, TN, NH4+-N and TP were 95.81%, 43.22%, 85.17% and 31.64%, respectively. Additionally, the growth rate of TMP was relatively low, approximately 2.692 kPa/d. When the gas to water ratio was 65∶1 and the dosage of PAC was 2 g/L, the average removal rates of COD, TN, NH4+-N and TP were respectively increased by 2%, 26%, 8% and 42% on the basis of the previous one, and the growth rate of TMP was enhanced to 6.425 kPa/d. At this point, although the treatment performance was superior, the operation cost was higher and the membrane filtration cycle was shorter. Therefore, in the practical application of PAC-MBR, it is essential to balance the expected treatment performance and operation cost prior to setting the operation parameters of MBR. The application of this control strategy enables the flexible adjustment of PAC-MBR to align with the development trend of pollution reduction and carbon reduction.

相似文献/References:

[1]郑俊,王梦琳,张德伟,等.无泡充氧膜生物反应器对生活污水处理效果的研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(13):55.
　ZHENG Jun,WANG Meng-lin,ZHANG De-wei,et al. Effect of Non-bubble Aerated Membrane Bioreactor on Domestic Wastewater Treatment [J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(17):55.
[2]孙剑宇,雷霆,梁鹏,等.脉冲曝气在大型膜生物反应器工程中的应用与优化[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(9):100.
　SUN Jian-yu,LEI Ting,LIANG Peng,et al.Application and Optimization of Pulse Aeration in Large-scale Membrane Bioreactor[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(17):100.
[3]张勇,秦玉兰,樊晓丽,等.平板陶瓷膜MBR工艺在农村污水处理中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(10):120.
　ZHANG Yong,QIN Yu-lan,FAN Xiao-li,et al.Application of Flat Ceramic MBR Process in Rural Sewage Treatment[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(17):120.
[4]杨应明,王旭东,刘玄宁,等.汲取液EDTA-2Na对正渗透MBR运行性能的影响[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(11):9.
　YANG Ying-ming,WANG Xu-dong,LIU Xuan-ning,et al.Effect of EDTA-2Na Draw Solute on Operating Performance of Forward Osmosis MBR[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(17):9.
[5]李莹,刘强,陈卫,等.胞外聚合物与膜污染的相关关系研究进展[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(12):25.
　LI Ying,LIU Qiang,CHEN Wei,et al.Advances of Correlation between Extracellular Polymers and Membrane Fouling[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(17):25.
[6]杨宗政,张天宇,王元培,等.基于互联网监控的焦化废水处理研究[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(19):98.
　YANG Zong-zheng,ZHANG Tian-yu,WANG Yuan-pei,et al.Treatment of Coking Wastewater Based on Internet Monitoring[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(17):98.
[7]刘妍,滕一杰,周家中,等.纯膜MBBR用于南方某大型水质净化厂改造效果分析[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(1):1.
　LIU Yan,TENG-Yi-jie,ZHOU-Jizhong,et al.Operation Effect of Pure MBBR Process Used in a Large-scale Water Purification Plant in South China[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(17):1.
[8]董堃,魏学睿,徐泸峰,等.响应曲面法优化Anammox-MBR工艺及膜表征[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(1):95.
　DONG Kun,WEI Xue-rui,XU Lu-feng,et al.Optimization of Anammox-MBR Process by Response Surface Methodology and Membrane Characterization[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(17):95.
[9]林静芳,张新颖,张莉敏,等.MBR工程长期运行中的膜清洗效果和膜性能变化[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(3):67.
　LINJing-fang,ZHANGXin-ying,ZHANGLi-min,et al.Membrane Cleaning Effect and Membrane Performance Change in MBR Projects during Long-term Operation[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(17):67.
[10]毛鑫,张冰,唐和礼,等.生物法减缓MBR膜污染的研究进展[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(18):34.
　MAOXin,ZHANGBing,TANGHe-li,et al.Research Progress of Biological Methods to Mitigate MBR Membrane Fouling[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(17):34.

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-01