CHENHao-lin,SHIDa-lin,ANDong,et al.Analysis of the Operation Comparison between Multi-stage A/O Process and MBR Process in North China[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(18):22-28.
北方地区多级A/O工艺与MBR工艺运行对比分析
- Title:
- Analysis of the Operation Comparison between Multi-stage A/O Process and MBR Process in North China
- Keywords:
- multi-stage A/O process; MBR process; energy consumption; cost
- 摘要:
- 污水处理工艺的比选对污水处理效率和运营成本至关重要。分段进水多级A/O工艺作为活性污泥法的一种，具有高效脱氮和节省成本的优点；MBR工艺同样具有高效的处理效率和节地的优势，但其高能耗的缺点较突出。针对北方某城市同一区域的A、B两座污水厂，从处理水量、水质、能耗和成本等方面进行分析，以期为同地区污水处理质量和付费监管以及新建污水处理厂工艺比选提供借鉴。对比分析可知，分段进水多级A/O工艺只需在进水TN冲击的工况下投加外碳源，相比MBR在全年超设计规模21.5% 水量工况运行下其电耗节省0.1 kW·h/m3。另外，MBR的次氯酸钠消耗较大，平均单耗比多级A/O工艺高出35 mg/L。经计算，多级A/O工艺的运营生产成本约0.495元/m3，MBR工艺的运营生产成本约0.955元/m3。
- Abstract:
- The comparison and selection of sewage treatment processes is very important to the efficiency and operating cost of sewage treatment. As one of the activated sludge processes, the step-feed multi-stage A/O process has the advantages of efficient nitrogen removal and cost saving. The MBR process also has the advantages of high treatment efficiency and land saving, but its disadvantage of high energy consumption is more prominent. This paper analyzes the treated water quantity, water quality, energy consumption and cost of two water plants in the same area of a city in the North China, so as sto provide reference for regional sewage treatment quality and payment supervision, and process selection of the new WWTP. The comparative analysis shows that the step-feed multi-stage A/O process only needs to add the external carbon source under the condition of influent TN impact. Compared with MBR under the condition of annual water volume exceeding the design scale by 21.5%, the power consumption of multi?stage A/O process is saved by 0.1 kW·h/m3. In addition, the sodium hypochlorite consumption of MBR is increased, and the average single consumption is 35 mg/L higher than that of the multi-stage A/O process. Through calculation, the operating production cost of multi-stage A/O process is about 0.495 yuan/m3, and the operating production cost of MBR process is about 0.955 yuan/m3.
相似文献/References:
[1]隋克俭,李家驹,孙永利,等.南方城镇污水极限氮磷去除工艺中试研究[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(7):97.
[2]陈浩林,彭轶,安东,等.基于BioWin软件对多级A/O工艺的运行优化[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(19):60.
CHEN Hao-lin,PENY Yi,AN Dong,et al.Operation Optimization of Multi-stage A/O Process Based on BioWin Software[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(18):60.
[3]李志雷,张开海.芬顿预氧化+MBR工艺处理制药等化工废水[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(10):160.
LIZhi-lei,ZHANGKai-hai.Treatment of Pharmaceutical Wastewater by Fenton Pre-oxidation and MBR Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2022,38(18):160.
[4]李娟,杨大卫.高出水标准含氟工业废水深度处理工程实例[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(2):126.
LIJuan,YANGDa-wei.Advanced Treatment Practice of Fluorine-containing Industrial Wastewater under High Effluent Quality Requirement[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(18):126.
[5]何京钟,孙竟,刘羿,等.多级A/O-MBR工艺在垃圾渗滤液应急处理中的应用[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(6):79.
HEJing-zhong,SUNJing,LIUYi,et al.Application of Multi-stage A/O-MBR Process in Emergency Treatment of Landfill Leachate[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(18):79.
[6]李捷,袁玮良,徐骄阳,等.生活垃圾转运站厨余垃圾渗滤液处理工程实践[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(8):125.
LI Jie,YUANWei-liang,XUJiao-yang,et al.Engineering Practice of Kitchen Waste Leachate Treatment in a Domestic Waste Transfer Station[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(18):125.
[7]王磊,陆峰,孙许平,等.A3O+MBR工艺生活污水处理厂节能降耗措施[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(20):83.
WANGLei,LUFeng,SUNXu-ping,et al.Energy Saving and Consumption Reduction Measures in A3O and MBR Domestic Sewage Treatment Plant[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(18):83.
[8]刘骁智,陈思彤,李小鹏,等.改良Bardenpho+MBR+活性焦处理化工园区废水[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(20):121.
LIUXiao-zhi,CHEN Si-tong,LIXiao-peng,et al.Treatment of Chemical Park Sewage by Improved Bardenpho Process, MBR and Active Coke Adsorption Process[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(18):121.