[1]许骐,李魁晓,王刚,等.再生水厂臭氧系统效能评估与优化[J].中国给水排水,2025,41(17):126-131.
　XUQi,LIKui-xiao,WANGGang,et al.Performance Evaluation and Optimization of Ozone System in a Reclaimed Water Plant[J].China Water & Wastewater,2025,41(17):126-131.
点击复制

再生水厂臭氧系统效能评估与优化

中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU] 卷: 第41卷 期数: 2025年第17期 页码: 126-131 栏目: 出版日期: 2025-09-01
Title:
Performance Evaluation and Optimization of Ozone System in a Reclaimed Water Plant
作者:
许骐1,2， 李魁晓1,2， 王刚1,2， 王慰1,2， 李鹏飞1， 姜大伟1,2， 王浩楠1,2
（1.北京城市排水集团有限责任公司，北京 100022；2.北京市污水资源化工程技术研究中心，北京 100124）
Author(s):
XU　Qi1，2， LI　Kui-xiao1，2， WANG　Gang1，2， WANG　Wei1，2， LI　Peng-fei1， JIANG　Da-wei1，2， WANG　Hao-nan1，2
（1. Beijing Drainage Group Co. Ltd.， Beijing 100022， China； 2. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Wastewater Resource， Beijing 100124， China）
关键词:
再生水厂;  臭氧系统;  层次分析法;  效能评估体系
Keywords:
reclaimed water plant;  ozone system;  analytic hierarchy process;  performance evaluation system
摘要:
为了科学评估再生水厂臭氧系统的运行效能，支撑再生水厂科学调整运行策略，以实现提升水质和节能降耗的目标，基于技术指标、经济指标、可靠性指标和环境指标，结合水厂实际运行数据进行分析，利用层次分析法（AHP）构建了包含4个准则和11项指标的臭氧系统效能综合评估体系。以北京市中心城区某再生水厂为例开展了评估体系应用研究，对2套臭氧系统进行定量测试评估。结果表明，M系统的水质达标率和仪表故障率得分分别是G臭氧系统的4.0和7.7 倍，综合得分高88.2%，运行效能明显更优
Abstract:
Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a comprehensive evaluation system comprising four criteria and eleven indicators was established based on technical, economic, reliability, and environmental indicators, in conjunction with a reclaimed water plant’s actual operational data, enabling a systematic and quantitative assessment of the ozone system’s operational performance. The aim is to scientifically evaluate the operational efficiency of the ozone system in the reclaimed water plant, assist the plant in making data-driven adjustments to its operational strategies, and achieve the objectives of enhancing water quality while conserving energy and reducing resource consumption. This paper applied and evaluated the evaluation system through quantitative testing and analysis of two ozone treatment systems of a reclaimed water plant located in the central urban area of Beijing. The scoring of the M system’s water quality compliance rate and the instrument failure rate were 4.0 times and 7.7 times that of the G system, respectively. Additionally, the comprehensive score of the M system was 88.2% higher, indicating significantly better operational performance.

相似文献/References:

[1]王赛,时玉龙,蒋奇海,等.两种碳基材料对二级出水中有机物的去除特性[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(5):43.
　WANG Sai,SHI Yu-long,JIANG Qi-hai,et al.Removal Characteristics of Organic Matters from Secondary Effluent by Two Types of Carbon Based Adsorbent[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(17):43.
[2]何楠,王睿,彭柱,等.再生水厂混凝沉淀—微滤协同运行优化研究[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(7):85.
　HE Nan,WANG Rui,PENG Zhu,et al.Optimization of Collaborative Operation of Coagulation-Sedimentation and Microfiltration in Reclaimed Water Treatment Plant[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(17):85.
[3]曾超,刘影,陈圆,等.某再生水厂两期脱氮除磷工艺设计及效能分析[J].中国给水排水,2024,40(18):64.
　ZENGChao,LIUYing,CHENYuan,et al.Process Design and Efficiency Analysis of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal in Two Phases of a Reclaimed Water Plant[J].China Water & Wastewater,2024,40(17):64.
[4]高靖伟,韩磊,江乐勇,等.鄂州航空都市区半地下再生水厂工程设计[J].中国给水排水,2025,41(18):61.
　GAOJing-wei,HANLei,JIANGLe-yong,et al.Engineering Design of a Semi-underground Reclaimed Water Plant in Ezhou Aviation Metropolitan Area[J].China Water & Wastewater,2025,41(17):61.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-09-01